FBI arrests man with middle name “NOFUCKS” for Brock Pierce related “threats.”

The FBI recently had a man named Jeremy “NOFUCKS” Ryan arrested in relation to alleged “true threats” he made towards Mighty Ducks child actor turned cyrpto entrepreneur Brock Pierce and others. As part of the Affidavit in support of the Criminal Complaint, Special Agent Richard Volp invoked the man’s own legally changed middle name as evidence of the alleged “threat” writing:

"I know through my experience that “Nofucks” is slang used to convey that a person does not care about the repercussions or consequences of their actions. It is reasonable to conclude displaying this prominently to VICTIM 1 conveys to him that RYAN does not have regard to the threats or harm he may cause. RYAN legally had his middle named changed in the state of California." (He actually changed it in Oregon)

The criminal complaint is ripe with text communications between “VICTIM 1” and “WITNESS 1” who are not named. However, the complaint states:

On December 2, 2025, RYAN posted an article he wrote on PatrolCrypto.com which alleges that both VICTIM 1 and WITNESS 1 were involved in illegal activity.

Jeremy did in fact post an article on December 2nd on PatrolCrypto.com — the main focus of that article was Brock Pierce and Chris Miglino. Jeremy posted 3 other articles about Brock throughout the coming weeks after. Curiously missing from these text messages are any actual threats of physical harm. He’s charged with 18 USC 875(c) which provides:

Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

In fact in one exchange, Jeremy writes “I don’t fight with violence but I guarantee looking back you!! [sic} wish I did” — despite this FBI agent Volp writes in the complaint:

"From my training and experience, I know that 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) prohibits the transmitting in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to injure the person of another. I also know that to not infringe on the First Amendment, the threat must be a “true threat,” which is a serious threat-not idle talk, a careless remark, or something said jokingly-that is made under circumstance that would place a reasonable person in fear of being injured or in fear of another person being injured. Whether the speaker is aware of, and intends to convey, the threatening aspect of the message is not part of what makes a statement a threat; the existence of a threat depends on what the statement conveys to the recipient of the message. Yet, the First Amendment still demands a subjective mental-state of at least recklessness.

Based on my training, experience, and knowledge of the investigation, I have probable cause to believe that RYAN’s posts made true threats, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c). I have probable cause to believe that RYAN acted at least recklessly and was aware that others could regard his statements as threatening violence when he sent them to VICTIM I and WITNESS 1, and his statements would place a reasonable person in fear of being injured, or in fear of another person being injured"

It’s hard to fathom that apparently the Victim, who is in the Middle District of Florida, and either is or is connected to Brock Pierce, who is connected to Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein somehow got the FBI to have some random kid arrested based on text “threats” and the FBI felt the need to redact the Victim and Witness names leaving Brock’s name completely off the complaint.